Over the last few months, I have really started to pay more attention to the issues of privatization in schools. I went to a
Teachers Unite forum a few weeks ago on this topic. They handed out some great reading material: "
The Big Enchilada: A Corporate Sneak Attack on the Public Schools" by Jonathan Kozol" and
Test Today, Privatize Tomorrow: Using Accountability to 'Reform' Public Schools to Death" by Alfie Kohn.
"The Corporate Surge Against Public Schools," an article by Steven Miller and Jack Gerson, has also been circulating the listservs.
I was interested, in particular, in Kohn's criticism of John Taylor Gatto, whose ideas I had come across and mentioned a while back. Kohn argues that Gatto's distinction between "education" and "school" is a good one, and is in agreement that public "school" in the US has always been dumbed down and designed to control others, to turn children into factory workers or servants. However, Kohn sharply criticizes Gatto's conclusion that public education as a whole is to blame and should be done away with; rather, we must claim public education for the interests of the public and for true democracy. Doing away with public education, as Gatto suggests, would only serve to further the corporate cause.
It was a wake-up moment for me when I began to put it all together -- the NYC reforms, NCLB, New Orleans, Philadelphia, small schools (like mine) that look and function just like charter schools, the grueling schedule of standardized tests and test prep, the attack on our UFT rights, and the apparent complicity of our own union in doing so. It is absolutely clear that we MUST stand up and unite against these forces that are truly out to demolish not only all public services, but all democracy as well. The question is how to do so.
I began my career with full faith in the union. In my first few months teaching, I saw the union and our sacred rights as absolutely essential to my survival as a teacher. As my regular readers know, I was even a chapter leader for a time. I knew enough to be skeptical of the administration's motives, but I was floored when I realized just how little support I could expect from the UFT. I have reached out to them on numerous occasions, always hoping that something good would come of it, but most of the time, I hear promises from the UFT reps and DRs that never come to fruition and I just live in fear about the negative consequences. And shortly after I began teaching, I watched as my rights slipped away with the new contracts: lunch duty (which is SUCH a waste of my time), extra time in the day with the 37.5 minutes, and most importantly, not being able to grieve letters in the file. Having been so burned time and again, most of my fellow teachers view the union with as much suspicion as the administration, making it that much harder to be united as a staff. Everyone is out for themselves and chaos ensues. A former colleague (who has since left teaching altogether) described teaching in the South Bronx as the "Wild West."
Ednotesonline discusses potential reasons that UFT opposition groups like ICE and TJC have a hard time appealing to a wide range of teachers. Arguably, I am one of those teachers ICE would like to recruit -- a socially conscious, union-valuing, critically thinking, activist type. I've been interested in ICE's activities and voted for ICE candidates in the last UFT election, but have shied away from getting involved for the very reasons Ednotes talks about. I'm overwhelmed by the nasty politics within the UFT and disgusted at the apparent lack of concern for what's happening in these small schools. If the teachers "won't stand up", or so the UFT DR's stance goes, then "what can we do?" I know that's not ICE's stance at all, but I think the UFT has been so corrupted that ICE, while a very important opposition voice, is in for an overwelmingly long and hard battle. Not unlike the Green party is to the Democrats/Republicans.
The problem with this logic is that the teachers
won't stand up with the UFT if they can't
trust the very people who are supposed to be looking out for their interests. The teachers won't stand up when every effort is made by the DOE and the principals to splinter the staff and create a culture of fear. The UFT should have been on the ground, uniting the staffs of these small schools, from the very beginning of all of the reorganizations. They shouldn't be waiting around for the desperate cries for help, only to pass the buck when it's clear the situation is hopeless. The teachers will NOT stand up with the UFT, because the UFT is not ultimately serving their interests lately. I mean, think about it. If the organization itself is top-down (I just learned that the District Reps are appointed by Randi herself!), how could it possibly be serving the interests of the teachers? Yet it's not as if the teachers are scaredy-cats who are all too afraid to do anything. On the contrary, the teachers are much smarter and refuse to align themselves against their own interests. That's why they are not so willing to stand up right now.
We desperately need
another way to unite ourselves. I am hoping Teachers Unite, under a larger umbrella than the UFT can ever hope for, will start the process.
Labels: Privatization, UFT